Answer:
MANAGE HER IDENTITY
Explanation:
Identity refers to an individuals or team's attributes, opinions, attitude, appearances and/or gestures. One might reflect toward identification categorization as either constructive or negative. A mental identity has something to do with personality-image, ego-esteem and uniqueness.
In the given case, Barbara is working on every above mentioned aspect of her personality so that all her co- workers would have a positive image of her in their minds. This process of deliberate change of personalty is called identity management.
Answer: Northerners became strong opponents of the strengthened Fugitive Slave Act, which was part of the compromise.
Explanation:
The 1850 compromise is the bill that was approved by the United States Congress to lessen the conflict between the southerners (slavers) and the northerners (free states).
Among the agreements that were to be reached with the compromise are; the status that the lands obtained from Mexico should have, whether they should be free states or slave states. There was also a desire to negotiate the Fugitive Slave Act, which determined that slaves fleeing to the north must be returned to their owners, but the northerners refused to comply.
The agreement was intended to maintain the union between the states, however, no agreement was reached.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
elaborate sculptures were one of them
Explanation:
you will find many of them still partly standing today
The correct answer is letter D.
Preparedness if often linked to the concept of learned helplessness. This is the common adaptive behavior of humans or organisms to certain experiences that have happened before. Usually it is a repeated painful stimuli that an organism has endured many times, which then when presented again, enables the organism to escape or avoid the situation. In essence, the stimulus is familiar, hence, the organism learns how to prepare for the outcome or consequence.
Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
