Answer #1: The Declaration of Independence is important because it gave all citizens proper rights and it created the Three Branches of Government.
Answer #2: The relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights is that they were both created for the good of the people.
Answer #3: The Ideas from the Declaration of Independence that support women's suffrage are that women can vote, inherit money from others, and that they can fight in a war.
If you lay siege to the castle you don't risk the lives of your men and loss of equipment, You can just "wait it out" - the castle is going to run our of resources and likely surrender. So if you can afford to wait, laying siege is a better idea.
Answer:
The given statement is true
Explanation:
When the supply of money rises, the aggregate demand also increases for the products. It, therefore promotes variance in prices to the positive side over a long period that later leads to output increase.
To determine the link that exists between money and the supplies is through simplification of the output, which does not change. The assumption, therefore, is essential in isolating money impact specifically on prices. However, this can be adjusted subsequently in fixing the output.
Answer:
selling Treasury bills, which decreases bank reserves.
Explanation:
The federal government on attempt to increase the federal funds can decide on selling treasury bills.
When the treasury bill is sold, it will affect bank reserves, the effect it will have on bank reserve will lead to decrement on the bank reserves.
Once there is a decrement in the bank reserve, after the treasury bill has been sold, this will lead to an increase on the federal funds.
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
