Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the details and example that the author used, with the reading of the text. However, according to the knowledge we have about Cleopatra, we can infer that the author may have shown that because she was a woman, Cleopatra's leadership was often questioned and devalued and therefore, she needed support from men for the policies created by her were efficiently established. However, while these men helped her, they also wanted to take her power, making them unreliable.
Answer: Bilbo's indecision about whether he should go on the adventure; his determination to give it a go
Explanation:
Conflict resolutions supposes reaching an agreement after pondering all possibilities and versions of the situation. Conflict resolution also means finding a solution to the difficult situation. The correct answer is the one related to Bilbo's indecision, because he was having a strong internal conflict about whether to go on the adventure or not, but he finally took a decision and came up with a solution, after all: to give it a go.
All the other instances do not comprise a solution: the dwarves have a grudge with the goblins, but the dwarves seeking revenge is not a solution. The dwarves telling the burglar they don't welcome him on the voyage isn't a solution either and they haven't reached any conclusion. Gandalf disappearing and then having an illness does not hint at any conflict (internal or between two parties) and his illness definitely isn't a resolution.
When Gregor died, he was transformed into a big insect. From then on, the story continues. Gregor had not realized that he was dead. They were so dependent on him. His passing had changed the way they looked at life. They were able to get jobs and the same time learned to use money wisely. They were able to save some of Gregor's saving and from their father's failed business.
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
Answer:
The author is writing the passage to talk about Conrad's life as a black man in Nigeria and the way he feels about the other black people's lives in Nigeria too.
Explanation:
