The Block Billionaires from buying elections act is unconstitutional because it restricts the right to freedom of expression.
The right to freedom of expression is a right that guarantees people to express themselves through:
- Ideas
- Thoughts
- Words
- Images
- Symbols
- Events
In a political campaign, candidates express through advertising and their campaigns the idea that they are the best option for the voters. Therefore, they are making use of their right to free expression.
If the court endorses this law that restricts candidates to use more than $999,999 in their political campaigns, it would be limiting the right to free expression because at that time the candidate expresses himself through his campaign.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/10673570
Answer:
B) Eros; Thanatos
Explanation:
Freud identifies two fundamental drives: <em>Eros </em>a drive to live, with a counterpart , a drive to die: <em>Thanatos</em>.
He uses both terms to identify drives related to survival: instincts, like hunger, thrist, and sexual drives.
The death instincts on the other hand, often engage in conflict , as they represent a "inner desire for dying", represented in irrational manners : hurting others, hurting onelself, murder.
He then applies these forces in the study of the subconscious mind in psychoanalysis.
Rivers were attractive locations for the first civilizations because they provided a steady supply of drinking water and made the land fertile for growing crops. Moreover, goods and people could be transported easily, and the people in these civilizations could fish and hunt the animals that came to drink water.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Informal reasoning
Explanation:
Informal reasoning refers to a form of reasoning that rely on general knowledge, personal thinking, and knowledge from other people in order to create a conclusion.
This type of reasoning is called 'informal' because it's not backed by proper/structured scientific research and can be heavily influenced by bias.
This can be seen in the example above. Making conclusion based on online reviews is heavily biased toward the personal preference of the reviewers.
