What Justice Brown says about a law that implies "merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races is that the distinction will continues though , there is no eradicate legal equality.
<h3>How did
Justice Brown legal distinction between the white and
colored races?</h3>
Justice Brown perceive this as something that will not stop so far there is distinguishing of the white from the other race .
However , he came to conclusion that this does not have tendency to bring destruction to legal equality of the races.
learn more about Justice Brown at brainly.com/question/24812344
#SPJ1
The answer is a destroying the society with war and waste
one who believes in atonement
Option B.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Crusaders were the people who wanted to bring about a change in the fields and areas of religion, political change and social change. They wanted to participate in the crusade for atoning for their sins and the wrong done by them.
Thus these were the people who believed in atonement, they believed that they could make up, do reparation for the wrong done by participating in the war of crusades.
December 16th, 1773. It is estimated that hundreds took part in the Boston Tea Party<span>. For fear of punishment, many </span>participants<span> of the </span>Boston Tea Party<span> remained anonymous for many years after the event. To date it is known that 116 people are documented to have participated.</span>
