Ask for suggestions, be kind, be sympathetic to better understand the issue
do you need help wording this?
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
Pretty. Thank you. ^^
I could say the same for you. Have a nice day :)
Answer:
<h3>Thurgood Marshall.</h3>
Explanation:
Thurgood Marshall was the first Supreme Court justice of African descend. He was a lawyer by profession and played an important role in bringing racial equality and liberty during the Civil Rights Movement.
Marshall became a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and it was during this time he served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. He successfully led the case and won a unanimous verdict against school segregation.
This case helped him gain lots of recognition and admiration. President Johnson appointed him as the first African-American Supreme Court justice in 1967.
