Answer: The verdict is decided by a petit jury
Explanation:
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Answer:
declared that separate educational facilities were unlawful
Explanation:
The Brown v. Board of Education was established in 1954 and created an opposition to the Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 who affirmed the legality of racial segregation in public places such as buses, schools, squares, hospitals and other places. This opposition was established because at the end of the Brown v. The Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that educational institutions that established systems of racial segregation would be acting illegally and that from that moment on they should promote full equal education to all students, regardless of their colors or races.
Answer:
checks and balances.
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a system that is typically used in a democratic society to enforce a balance of power between the three (3) arms of government; executive, judiciary and legislative arm. These checks and balances are really important and necessary so as to ensure there wouldn't be an abuse of power by any of arm of government.
Hence, the senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of checks and balances.
