C) Compass - Makes the most sense to me.... Hope this helps... :)
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be
Answer: not that it would injure me, but it might embarrass them
Explanation:
I couldn't get the passage or text where this came from but I'll still like to help.
The option that best describes Douglas writing style of showing both negative and positive points of view is "not that it would injure me, but it might embarrass them".
The positive view is that there won't be any injury to the writer. In this case, the writer is not negatively affected. On the other hand, the negative point of view is that others can be embarrassed. Embarrassing other people is something negative. .
Therefore, the option chosen has both positive and negative impact unlike other option.
Answer:
There are several advertisements aimed at teenagers.In my experience I would say that most of them are decidely effective.
Think of clothing , for instance.Casual clothes and mainly denim designs are attractive for all teenagers.Most ads show popular and good looking teens having a great time together while wearning America´s favourite brand; Levi´s.
Won´t teens be looking forward to taking up a sport just to wear a pair of Nike trainers for running?The commercials show successful sportspeople in them all the time.It is not surprising they are sold all around the planet.
Whether the advertisements are ethical or not depends on what it is consedered ethical in advertising.In other words, if the young are going to insist in having something just because it is popular, and in addition parents will feel it is an obligation to buy the product , the ad is unethical. It is not correct to make the young, just because they are inexperienced , strongly believe that something is a must to have.The only ones who benefit from selling are the business people who sell the products advertised.
Teens see, teens want and advertisers know that.They create ads to catch teenagers´ interest in having those products that make them feel they are on top of the world.
Explanation:
none
Ask verifying questions or change the subject....
My personal answer would be change the subject
ESPACIALLY if its politicts