Answer:
Setting of the scene include additional information about where and when the action takes place. They are added to the dialogue in the script and are written in brackets.
We could also say that it consists of all information and details, other than the dialogue itself.
Now, we only need to read the text carefully again.
1) Since Frank and Ann came into Darcy's room, we would write it as [ENTER FRANK AND ANN].
2) Frank asked for keys, so we would write [FRANK:] Darcy, do you have the keys?
3) Darcy don't know the exact location of the keys, so she checks her pockets first, before going out of the room to find them:
Darcy: [searching her pockets] I left them upstairs. Wait here for a minute. [exit Darcy.]
This is hard to answer without context but;
Diction would be the word choice which would tie into imagery and therefore into figurative language. The theme would be an overall concept such as guilt, reverence, depression etc. Pick a theme that you think is well represented and then format it appropriately. so like,
" In "The Yellow Wallpaper" (italicize that too) by Charlotte P. Gillman the audience is introduced to the theme of *insert whatever your theme is* this theme is throughly represented by her usage of words such as *Insert words that support the theme/mood*. The theme is also well represented by her use of figurative language, this is best represented in the lines *Insert 3 good examples or fig. lang. ( ex. Metaphor, Simile,Onamonapia, alliteration, Personification etc) "
In the sentence "These days, parents neglect to watch their children's social media use", we find an example of the hasty generalization fallacy.
Hasty generalization does not present enough evidence to support the argument made and, therefore, generalizes a fact. In the sentence above, there is an affirmation that parents do not watch their children's social media use. How can the speaker state this? Who are these parents: all of them? Just a percentage? What about the parents who do watch their kids' use of social media? Do they not count?
As for the other options given, let's take a look at a brief description of what they mean:
Non sequitur is when a conclusion does not follow the evidence presented. It's an absurd conclusion, considering the information given. --> People like watching movies. Movies have violence. Therefore, having some violence happen to people is desirable.
Post hoc is a fallacy in which the speaker assumes there is a connection between events simply because they happened one after the other. That is, if B happened after A, then B happened because of A. --> If it rained after I had an ice cream, then it rained because I had the ice cream.
False analogy happens when the speaker analyzes two different facts under the same point of view and conditions, drawing a conclusion that is far-fetched. --> Monica is from South America. Alice is also from South America. Therefore, Monica and Alice are from the same country.
