Some came to escape religious persecution, while others came to acquire land.
Answer:
The incandescent lighting increased company work production.
Explanation:
A major argument against legalizing euthanasia is a concern that it may lead society to condone the killing of those who are not ready to die, creating a slippery slope.
<h3>What is
euthanasia?</h3>
Euthanasia is the practice of ending a patient's life in order to relieve their suffering. Normally, the patient in question would have a serious illness or be in excruciating agony. The Greek words "EU" (good) and "Thanatos" are the origin of the word "euthanasia."
The Christian commandment "Do not kill," respect for life or the sanctity of life, the principle of non-maleficence (do no harm), the Hippocratic Oath, and a few so-called "slippery-slope arguments" are some of the moral grounds against euthanasia that will be covered first.
Legalization has three key advantages:
- Achieving personal autonomy,
- Minimizing unnecessary pain and suffering,
- Giving terminally ill patients psychological confidence.
To know more about euthanasia refer to: brainly.com/question/2940464
#SPJ4
Answer:
John Locke
Explanation:
John Locke was an English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers, especially concerning the development of political philosophy. His writings influenced Voltaire and Rousseau, but most importantly, the American revolutionaries.
C.) To fuel space exploration programs
C is the correct answer because through the process of elimination, we know that European countries are trying to find energy sources the reduce the amount of air pollution, so A is not correct. Also, we know B is not correct because since fossil fuels aren't always widely available in Europe, drastically running out, and the population of the continent keeps increasing, European countries are struggling to keep up with the demand for fossil fuels. As a result, they are trying to find cheap, renewable energy resources to keep up with the demands of the ever-growing population. Let's skip to D. D is not correct at all because European countries actually <em>do </em>want to find new renewable energy sources, for the reasons stated in A and B. By investing in them, European countries are funding scientists to help harness the power of nature (solar, wind, hydroelectric, etc...). Let's go back to C. Yes, a huge amount of fossil fuels are used for fuel in a rocket, and scientists may be trying to find ways to use renewable energy instead of precious fossil fuels, but is that a main reason for European countries investing in new sources of energy? No, it may be a <em>minor </em>reason, not even a reason at all, but definitely <em>not </em>a main reason. After looking at answer choices A, B, and D, you can conclude C is not a reason for why European countries have invested in new sources of energy.
