Hello there
the answer is
It seems to me that those cultures which have an oral rather than a written tradition have rather sophisticated ways of memorising certain things. Many of them are strongly attached to land which is the basis of not only their livelihood, but also their spiritual beliefs.
Basically, from my limited understanding, the land then acts as a “map” for many things, from the surrounding geography through to a “map” of their spiritual beliefs. As land has lots of identifying markers, this then acts as an aid to remembering most details of the lives of people from such cultural traditions.
1. Greeks ate dinner while laying on their sides
2. They invented the yo-yo
3. 1/3 of the population was slaves
Answer:
The correct answer is Demographic segmentation by Income
Explanation:
In marketing Demographic segmentation implies segmentation of the market in groups by certain factors, like for example, race, age, education, income, religion, etc... to exploit the demographics in their advantage this marketing study helps to identify where would a product or service sell more, or where is convenient to open up a business.
Now in this particular case, Deal$ stores are using income segmentation by selling products of a certain (in this case lower) price, the whole attractive of Deal$ stores is the lower price and not the quality of the products sold there, thats why income segmentation is present, because they are literally aiming at one specific kind of customer that wants really low prices.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
