Answer:
<u>Option- </u>True.
- The following statement is correct in all sense, which is given to us as, <em>"According to Matsumoto and Fletcher (1996), culture influences human emotion and human physiology, particularly with respect to autonomic nervous system activity and the immune system."</em>
Explanation:
Culture is defined as the basic set of regional or community rules which are supposed to be followed by the individual living in that space or region, so, culture has a specific role in development of any person's nature, career, and identity inside any region. While, it gives a more different features or we can say characteristics to the individual as it particularly adjusts the person's autonomic nervous system activities and the immune system itself. As we can analyze that people belonging to different cultures have a more or less differently developed physical and mental well being as compared to other individuals of the different cultures.
Answer:
A)night terrors.
Explanation:
Night terror: The term night terror refers to the process in which an individual wakes up partially from the sleep including behaviors like kicking, sleepwalking, mumbling, panic, screaming, thrashing, etc. The night terrors are considered to be as harmless and usually ends when an individual is in deep sleep. It can be caused by several psychological triggers, for example, depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety.
In the question above, Bobby suffers from night terrors.
Answer:
The answer is D. Employers want to be sure the economy is improving before hiring new workers.
Explanation:
I just took the test and that was right.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
The answer would be B The social imperative