The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Answer:
C) 3 sec
Explanation:
We must have to maintain the spacing of 3 Seconds. To be on the safer side, we should not enter into the gap which is way too close. Afterwards, we have to keep an eye on the other vehicles around us as well by using our both side mirrors and the back mirror. We should use indicators when necessary and we then must keep 3 second of distance between us and the next vehicle. This is very necessary because we can easily stop our vehicle by pulling the breaks and when it is required. Always try to remain on the safe side, main logic here is; Precaution is better than cure.
<span>In order for a bill to be presented to the President for signature, it must pass both the House and Senate in the exact same form. The device used for reaching agreement between the two Houses is often, but not always, a conference committee. Sometimes differences between the two bodies are resolved by amendment — e.g., the House will agree to the bill as passed by the Senate with an amendment and the Senate will subsequently concur with that amendment.</span>
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
Moving a balloon across a wool cloth is an example of a contact force
A study of how people tend to act when presented with a moral problem or dilemma is known as descriptive ethics.
Descriptive ethics is the field of ethics carried out to understand people's behavior and moral values.
It is easy to perform and it is usually done by asking different questions to a group of people. Descriptive ethics is also called comparative ethics. Results from descriptive ethics can be used under the physiological status of the group.
It is also experimental research carried out to undermine the ethical patterns of society. Other forms of ethical study like the expressive study are done to understand the actions or words of the individual.
To know more about ethics, visit
brainly.com/question/1423505
#SPJ4
The scientific study of how people tend to act when presented with a moral problem or dilemma is known as ______ ethics.
evocative
expressive
descriptive
prescriptive
