Answer:
c) going to war
Explanation:
Harry S. Truman who was president in the years somewhere in the range of 1945 and 1952 and then again George W. Shrubbery whose administration was from 2001-2009 are the leaders of the United States who have confronted the best universal difficulties ever of nation. Just half a month in the wake of getting down to business, before the surrender of Hitler, Truman would meet the other two associated boss, Winston Churchill and Stalin, in Potsdam, Germany.
Washington settled on the choice to utilize the nuclear bomb, with the particular motivation behind acquiring the unequivocal surrender of Japan. In his addresses, Truman persuaded his kin to dispatch the most significant technique of global guide ever, the Marshall Plan: 13,000 million dollars for Europeans to raise their economy. On his side, just 20 days subsequent to dispatching the Oval Office on February 16, 2001, President Bush arranged a bombarding of Iraq in striking back for having flown over the prohibition zone. He thought for three weeks with his war bureau and, when threats started in Afghanistan, the Pentagon had built up close coordinated effort with European partners, particularly with Great Britain and France. In his discourses begin his campaign against global fear based oppression.
The answer is appeals to reason and appeals to ethics
The answer is B) She is trying to care for him but is getting frustrated and losing patience.
Answer:
Cheating in the card game at the end of the novel presents the picture of corruption and evil in the political system. The pigs and the humans both were indulged in the same type of corruption and cheating in the card game. This exemplifies the strength of the political power. Whether it be a human or a pig, the nature of the politician changes with respect to that of the power. Mr. Pilkington and Napoleon entered a heated argument in which both of them tried to cheat in the similar way. This brings to the conclusion that both the pigs and the humans played the role of liars, manipulators and hypocrites when the question of politics and humanities were asked.