Answer:
1. yes, this is justifiable because if someone is attacking you, you have to defend yourself.
2. Yes, even if the country is neutral, the people of that country should be protected against an invasion.
3. No, a lot of people die in wars and it isn't worth it just gor alliances.
4. No, war will not make your countru stronger in any way, it will just make things worse.
5. Yes, power and territory in other parts of the world will help your country gain influence if you are a good leader.
6. Yes, your country will not survive without certain resources.
7. No, a war will not prevent another war.
Answer:D
Explanation:
As we see on the graph, near the year 1600 the population falls a bit.
1600-1800 recieved the most change in relation to the previous years.
That is also when industrialization happened, so it makes sense why the population would spike.
It would lead to the conclusion that ethnic and religious tensions are key catalysts of political conflicts.
Rwanda ethnic tensions that had roots in the per-colonial era culminated in the genocide that was witnessed in the 1990's while the Kashmir conflict can be dated back to the religious difference of the people living in the area.
<span />
Answer:
B???
Explanation:
I think it's B but take that with a grain of salt. I'm incredibly sorry if that's not it.
