Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, so your answer is A
The Mandate framework put the Ottoman domain under the hidden control of European forces, Britain being one of them, they meddled with the center east giving some power taking from others deceiving, and abusing for pick up. For instance Britain put lord Faisal in energy of Iraq they enabled it to be autonomous yet give certain accommodating things to Britain, in Egypt they made Egypt a protectorate despite the fact that they called it independent,stationing troops along the Suez channel, they endeavored to remove Egyptian troops from Sudan, and kept Egypt off its toes in light of a partnership with a feeble ruler, when Palestine turned into a command of Britain Jewish individuals moved to there in huge numbers to the hate of the Arabs living there, in the long run getting scorn through various routes from the two sides. While the contention wasn't unequivocally expressed as one from religious contrasts, the Christian British exploiting the Muslim Arabs for arrive power and assets while additionally providing for the Jewish individuals at that point endeavoring to increase back control from them while the Arabs and Jews were battling could be viewed as a religious clash in a turmoil filled territory.
Answer:
I am pretty sure it is D. It offers advice on acquiring and maintaining political power.
Explanation:
Good Luck!
Answer:
Explanation:
to insure that Americans were not excluded. Although this goal sometimes required acquisition of islands, since bases were needed both for trade and for the exercise of political and military influence, it did not require assumption of larger administrative responsibilities. Americans, by their competitive superiority, could achieve economic dominance without taking on such burdens.” In other words, May argues that the main reason why American imperialism did not take the form of conquering and holding land was that there was that cost-benefit analysis would provide more profit if the nations in question retained political autonomy yet opened their borders to trade with America. It is simply more advantageous for a capitalist society to secure the flow of trade (by breaking down barriers and raising our own tariffs as seen fit) rather than to secure land; the latter was indeed the mentality of a feudalistic society, the claiming of earth for little more than just that. It has long been a tradition of American historians to prove that American intentions are not imperialistic.