Answer:
The type of sampling used in Jankowski's study of gangs is Option D. Stratified sampling.
Explanation:
With stratified sampling, the researcher will partition the population into different groups, usually based on some characteristic that is common to that group. In this case, it was the different kinds of gang membership. Then, the researcher will take a sample of people within each specific group using another sampling method like simple random sampling for instance. The groups that are used in stratified sampling are called strata. Another example would be a national survey that is divided into strata of the different major ethnic groups that comprise the national population.
The people of Sumer are among the earliest denizens of Mesopotamia. By about 4000 BCE, the Sumerians had organized themselves into several city-states that were spread throughout the southern part of the region. These city-states were independent of one another and were fully self-reliant centers, each surrounding a temple that was dedicated to god or goddess specific to that city-state. Each city-state was governed by a Priest King.
Answer:
A. chart A
Explanation:
As you may already know, GDP is the acronym that represents all the production of products and services that a country has produced within a certain period of time.
In the case of New Zealand, GDP is influenced by services, industrial products and agricultural products. Despite having a considerable agricultural production, agriculture is only responsible for about 5% of the country's GDP, with most of the GDP influenced by the provision of services, which accounts for 71% and the industrial sector, which accounts for 24 %.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that ypur question is incomplete because it doesn't include any context, reference, map, or something we can use to help you answer the question.
What tribes are you referring to? What is the time in history?
However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
We assume that you are referring to the European presence in Africa after the Berlin Conference of 1855. If that is the case, then we can say that what happened to tribes when the Europeans made these new borders was that they eliminate some borders, modified others, create new regions, moved tribes from their former territories, and displaced people.
This was a moment in history known as the Scramble for Africa," that started in 1885 and ended approximately in 1914.
The European countries involved in the partition of Africa were France, Great Britain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. In reality, these countries were only interested in colonizing Africa to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of the continent.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
