The Kamp family has twins, Rob and Rachel. Both Rob and Rachel graduated from college 2 years ago, and each is now earning $50,0
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The third picture
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve for x in both equations
2x<6
Divide both sides by 2:
x<3
3x+2>-4
Subtract 2 from both sides:
3x>-6
Divide both sides by 3:
x>-2
There is this trick you can use when x is on the left side of the equation to find out which way to shade in you graph. Keep in mind this is only for the left side, it will not work if your variable is on the right.
When the symbol is facing left < then shade left, imagine it is pointing which way to shade. x<3 is represented by the 3 picture on the left. When the symbol is facing right > then shade right, again it is pointing which way to shade. x>-2 is represented by the 3 picture on the right.
The circles are not filled in because the symbol is < and > rather than . When it is greater than or equal to or less than and equal to (represented by the line under the symbol), then the circle is shaded in.
Answer:
The error is at step (3) .
The correct step (3) will be,
= [by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The error is at the step (3) , because the student has tried to prove the quotient rule of logarithms by using the property i.e., 'The quotient rule of logarithm' itself , i.e. ,by assuming the property does hold before proving it. So, the proof is fallacious.
The correct step (3) will be,
= [by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.