Answer: over-borrowing.
Explanation:
credit cards function like this: you can "buy" a lot of things with it, including very very expensive things. this is because instead of really buying that product, you borrow money from the bank to buy it. you then have to pay it off in slower amounts of money over time until youve paid off the original cost of the product and more because the bank will most likely charge interest.
sounds great, right?
it is, until you cant afford to pay those smaller amounts of money. then, it starts to build up and if you still cant afford to pay the bank, they will begin to liquidize your physical assets (they take your stuff as payment, really anything, even your house can be taken.)
Answer:
To evaluate the effectiveness of controls over all relevant financial statement disclosures in the financial statements.
Explanation:
In Accounting, an internal control is a mechanism, procedure, rule or policy designed by management to secure assets, promote efficiency, ensure accountability and prevent fraudulent behavior in an organization.
The main goal of auditing internal control is to evaluate the effectiveness of controls over all relevant financial statement disclosures in the financial statements.
Answer: Amy is <em>concerned </em>with her organization's i<em>nability to solve problems</em> quickly. Several <u>subordinates have complained</u> to her that they feel alienated from the management <u>making the decisions</u> about their jobs with<u> no input </u>from them.
The element that Amy should address is the Chain of command.
Explanation:
A chain of command is a system for sending inside information of organizations with strong, vertical and authoritative structures.
The continuous flow of the chain of command clearly establishes the authority, revealing this depending on who reports to whom.
We must take into account the Authority and the Unit of command. This last is very important because it states that each supervisor must inform only one superior and like this the company preserves the continuous line of authority so all employees are heard and their ideas are taken into consideration for making decisions.
Correct question:
A winning formula for many ________ brands is craftsmanship, heritage, authenticity, and history, often critical to justifying a sometimes extravagant price.
A) design
B) non durable
C) durable
D) ingredient
E) luxury
Answer:
E, luxury
Explanation:
When a product is being purchased irrespective of it price, the manufacturer is said to have found a winning formula.
from the above question, a luxury item that is authentic with an history behind it as well as exccellenct craftsmanship amongst other things ensure that the item is continually sold no matter what price it is.
Cheers.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
