Answer:
$444,444.44
Explanation:
Larry's life insurance corporation is trying to sell an investment policy that will pay you and your heirs a total amount of $32,000 per year
The required return on this investment is 7.2%
= 7.2/100
= 0.072
Since the cash flow is a perpetuity then, the amount that will be paid for the policy can be calculated as follows
PV= C/r
= $32,000/0.072
= $444,444.44
Hence the amount of money that will be paid for the policy is $444,444.44
Answer:
Total present value=$617,523.24
Explanation:
The formula for calculating continuous compounding is given as follows
F=P(e^it)
F=future value
P=present value
i=interest rate
t=time involved i.e 1 year or 2 year
e=Mathematical constant=2.7183
By applying above mentioned formula, the present value of inventory control software by Baron Chemicals shall be calculated as follows:
Present value of year 2 Cash flow= $286,555.76
($350,000/e^10%*2)
Present value of year 1 Cash flow= $180,967.48
($200,000/e^10%*1)
Present value of year 0 Cash flow= $150,000
Total present value=$617,523.24
Answer:
The answer is 1. quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied.
When the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied, this makes room for a shortage of goods in the market a day and excess demand. Because of this, the price of existing products increase as a lesser number of goods has to be distributed among many people.
When such scenarios happen, the government can take actions such as importing goods from abroad.
Explanation:
The sectors are international, household, business, and government. The largest spending is consumption spending. That being said the answer would be household.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
