Answer:
a) Disclose in the notes
b) no Disclosure
c) Record a liability
Explanation:
There are three scenarios to be considered
1) It is reasonably possible that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. The loss cannot be estimable
First, premise is that Huprey Co. is facing a lawsuit and the possibility of a loss is most possible. If Huprey Co is able to recognize the amount of loss, then he would have been able to record a liability but the inability to estimate the loss means, the company can o<u>nly make appropriate disclosure in notes</u>
2)Huprey is being used for damages of $2 million. It is very unlikely (remote) that Huprey will lose the case.
This second premise is also a lawsuit on damages for $2 million, however, it is most reasonably acceptable that Huprey will win the lawsuit. As such there is no loss, that way there will be no disclosure in Huprey Co's books.
3. Huprey can reasonably estimate that a pending lawsuit will result in damages of $1.25 million, it is probable that Huprey will lose the case.
The probability of losing a case means that there will be a loss to be recorded in the books and since the damages are already estimable to be $1.25 million. Huprey Co should record a liability
Answer:
C. conservatism
Explanation:
The lower of cost or market basis of valuing inventories is an example of conservatism. This term refers to trying to anticipate possible future losses, instead of gains and making certain decisions in order to limit those losses. Which some decisions may include lowering costs and/or prices in order to sell more and cover those potential losses.
I believe the answer is Legal standing.
People who had a legal standing are the one that will recieve either harm or benefit after a decision is made.
The amount of involvement that certain parties had in the case will determine how much involvement the party is allowed to influence the case.
Answer: I honestly have no idea im just stupid and i need points so yea im sry bye
Explanation:
