1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Contact [7]
3 years ago
13

How do you think paine's sign-off helps his case against the english?

History
2 answers:
forsale [732]3 years ago
5 0
<span>I believe that the answer to the question provided above isthat he inspired the </span>rebels<span> in 1776 to declare independence from Britain and</span><span> his ideas reflected Enlightenment-era rhetoric of transnational human rights.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
</span>
Maslowich3 years ago
4 0

Thomas Paine's sign-off in <em>Common Sense </em>answered any objections that he was making an "ungodly" argument against the "God-ordained" monarchy of England, by asserting that good Christians will also believe that church and state need to be kept separate.

An old idea about monarchy, against which thinkers like Thomas Paine were reacting, was that a king ruled by "divine right."  This idea asserted that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler.  Early Enlightenment philosopher John Locke had repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government.</em>, and Thomas Paine had done some of the same in <em>Common Sense </em>in the section of the pamphlet, "Of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession."   Paine's sign-off showed that he was not irreligious or against God, but that the English had overdone their position by trying to mingle religion and politics and claim God's backing for all that the royal government did.  

Here are the words of Paine's sign-off in <em>Common Sense:</em>

  • <em>And here without anger or resentment I bid you farewell. Sincerely wishing, that as men and Christians, ye may always fully and uninterruptedly enjoy every civil and  religious right; and be, in your turn, the means of securing it to others; but that the  example which ye have unwisely set, of mingling religion with politics, may be  disavowed and reprobated by every inhabitant of AMERICA.</em>
You might be interested in
Describe the qualities of Maharana Pratap
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

Maharana Pratap was a brave and patriotic Rajput with love for his motherland. He was an egoistic but responsible person. He Could have finished him self instead of going into exile but for the sake of his family's responsibility he struggles and survives.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was an impact of British Imperialism on the people of India?
matrenka [14]

Answer:

probably c

Explanation:

British rule in India had both negative and positive effects on India. British rule brought Western technologies that improved medicine, transportation, warfare, and production of goods. This advancement in technology increased population and food production in India, benefitting everyone.

6 0
3 years ago
Who wrote abhijnana shakuntalam​
velikii [3]

Answer:

Kalidasa

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the beginning of the Civil War, who was in the lead? The North or the South and why.
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

The correct answer is the South, because in the initial battles and skirmishes Southern Army managed to defeat the Union Army. Among those battles the most famous ones were the battles of Battle of Bull Run and Battle of Wilson's Creek in Missouri. The main reason for this is that the Southern Army had larger number of capable generals who managed to tactically defeat their opponents.

Explanation:

Union Army although had larger numbers didn't had such a strong leadership on the battlefield in the beginning. That is why in most of the first battles during the first year of the war they were defeated.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the three-part government of the British colonies? What did each part do?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

*A Governor*- colonial governors enforced laws, appointed administrators and judges, also served as commander-in-chief over their own territory and held the veto power. *The Council of Advisors*- was the upper house of legislature, approving executive proceedings, and in most cases, colonies gave them power administered by a supreme court. *Elected Assembly*- assemblies were the avenue citizens used for political demands.The assembly was the only part of the legislature that could pass atxes. 
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are totalitarian governments often controlled by a single political party
    7·1 answer
  • Why did congressional republicans pass amendments to the constitution
    5·1 answer
  • List three ways Greek city-states created the idea of citizenship.
    14·2 answers
  • How did the people offend God​
    5·1 answer
  • Which sentence describes how the migration of farmers from rural to urban areas affected Europe?
    11·2 answers
  • What are the differences in the development of ancient china and ancient egypt
    11·1 answer
  • At first, the colonies did not pay taxes and were allowed to govern themselves. What happened to cause the tax policy to change?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the name for someone that takes up a new belief system?​
    11·1 answer
  • Other than in Europe, where were England and France fighting?
    9·1 answer
  • What does mccarthy claim about the 57 individuals whose cases he has in his hand
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!