Answer:
<u><em>Emperor Justinian</em></u><u><em>, I was a </em></u><u><em>master legislator</em></u><u><em>. He reorganized the administration of the </em></u><u><em>imperial</em></u><u><em> government and outlawed the </em></u><u><em>suffragia</em></u><u><em>, or sale of</em></u><u><em> provincial governorships</em></u><u><em>. He also sponsored the </em></u><u><em>Codex Justinianus</em></u><u><em> (Code of Justinian) and directed the </em></u><u><em>construction</em></u><u><em> of several new </em></u><u><em>cathedrals</em></u><u><em>, including the</em></u><u><em> Hagia Sophia</em></u><u><em>.</em></u>
Explanation:
<u><em>Hope this helps:)</em></u>
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
The social structure in Renaissance Italian states is:
- The nobles,
- merchants,
- middle class
- lower class
The political structure in Renaissance Italian states included:
- The rise of strong governments
- A shift towards an urban economy
- The use of commerce rather than agriculture.
<h3>What is Renaissance?</h3>
This refers to the period in history that saw the revival of European art and literature under the influence of classical models in the 14th–16th centuries.
Hence, we can see that the social structure in Renaissance Italian states is:
- The nobles,
- merchants,
- middle class
- lower class
Read more about Renaissance here:
brainly.com/question/879750
#SPJ1
The correct answer is The goods that consumers want are often undersupplied while those consumers don't want are over supplied
Explanation: Command Economy is an economic system whose production is controlled by the state, which defines the planning and goals of the country's economy. Also called Centralized Economy or Centrally Planned Economy, is the model proposed by Socialism.
The United States declared war<span> on Britain in </span>1812<span>. It did so because Britain refused to stop seizing American ships that traded with France—Britain's enemy in Europe. Sometimes there were also seizures of American sailors. These seizures were known as impressment. I think it was necessary; sooner or later it was going to happen.</span>