Answer: One of the many differences between the American and French Revolutions is that, unlike the French, Americans did not fight for an abstraction. ... However, the French Revolution was about who should rule at home. They fought for “liberty, equality, and fraternity.”
Explanation:
Answer:uv
5
Explanation:
U av to relax look at problem of finding the ans den think before the ans upside down
<em>The answers are:</em>
1. <u>Zerubbabel
</u>
Leader under whom the second temple was built
<em>Ezra 5:2
</em>
2. <u>Shiloh </u>
First place where tabernacle rested in Canaan
<em>Joshua 18:1</em> <em>(In Gilgal the Bible doesn't say anything about the Tabernacle)
</em>
3. <u>Gibeon</u>
Location of tabernacle during David's reign
<em>1 Chronicles 21:29
</em>
4. <u>Mount Zion</u>
Place where ark was set within curtains
<em>2 Samuel 6:2;16
</em>
5. <u>City of david</u>
Another name for the city of Jerusalem
<em>2 Samuel 5:7
</em>
6. <u>Nob</u>
Second place where tabernacle rested in canaan
<em>1 Samuel 21:1-9
</em>
7. <u>Nazarite</u>
Man or woman who took a vow of separation
<em>Numbers 6:2
</em>
8. <u>Ithamar</u>
Son of Aaron who ministered in the priest's office
<em>Numbers 3:4
</em>
9. <u>Aaron</u>
Crown was inscribed "holiness to the lord"
<em>Exodus 28:36
</em>
10. <u>Nadab</u>
Aaron's first-born son
<em>Numbers 3:2</em>
In this case Preeta read total of 300 pages in 6 days by reading 10 more pages than the previous day.
Pages she read in six days can be calculated in this case as:
On the first day she reads 25 pages on the second day she reads 35 (25 + 10) pages, on the third day she reads 45 (35+10) pages, similarly on the fourth day she reads 55 (45+10) pages, on the fifth day she reads 65 (55+10) pages and on the last i.e. sixth day she reads 75 (65+10) pages, making it a total of 300 pages in six days.
Procedure:
Let the no. of pages she reads on day 1 be x
Then for six days:
x + x+10 + x+20 + x+30 + x+40 + x+50 = 300
6x + 150 =300
6x = 150 (300-150)
x = 150÷6
x = 25
Learn more about such cases here:
brainly.com/question/20131062
#SPJ1
It is certainly not for altruistic purposes. Although he does have a point about the fact that energetic independence would boost American security by avoiding trade with brutal, dictatorial regimes as Islamic Saudi Arabia, Iran or other totalitarian regimes which provides them with funds; Pickens is mainly interested in furthering his own interests with regards to his own economic stakes in the fracking industry of shale gas and oil.
He also wants demand of oil and other fossile fuels to be reduced so thattheir prices go up, increasing his profit margins exponentially. He definitely does not care about the deleterious effects of fracking on the environment.
