According to the Constitution the answer is yes. The federal government is the guardian of the Constitution and Article IV the Constitution establishes a series of guidelines and principles that dictate the duties, rights and powers of states towards the federal government and to each other. Two sections are of special importance:
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
This section is known as the “Full Faith and Credit Clause” and it means for example that a couple who married in Colorado and then moves to Texas will still be legally married in Texas which is bound by this clause to accept the marriage certificate from Colorado as a valid legal document.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
This Section is known as the Privileges and Immunities Clause and it means for example that American citizens to move from Texas to California have to be granted all the rights and privileges that the state of California has granted to its native-born residents.
Answer:
waste my points i waste urs xD
Explanation:
Answer: Because their are out there teens.
Explanation:
Answer:
freedom of the press.
Explanation:
If that is what you meant
Freedom of the press:Freedom of the press or freedom of the media is the principle that communication and expression through various media, including printed and electronic media, especially published materials, should be considered a right to be exercised freely. Such freedom implies the absence of interference from an overreaching state; its preservation may be sought through constitution or other legal protection and security.
Without respect to governmental information, any government may distinguish which materials are public or protected from disclosure to the public. State materials are protected due to either one of two reasons: the classification of information as sensitive, classified or secret, or the relevance of the information to protecting the national interest. Many governments are also subject to "sunshine laws" or freedom of information legislation that are used to define the ambit of national interest and enable citizens to request access to government-held information.
The United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers".[1]
This philosophy is usually accompanied by legislation ensuring various degrees of the freedom of the scientific research (known as the scientific freedom), the publishing, and the press. The depth to which these laws are entrenched in a country's legal system can go as far down as its constitution. The concept of freedom of speech is often covered by the same laws as freedom of the press, thereby giving equal treatment to spoken and published expression. Sweden was the first country in the world to adopt freedom of the press into its constitution with the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766.
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The history of the American Revolution truly starts with the French and Indian War (1754-63), without which no defiance would have occurred when it did. The British assumed control North America toward the finish of the war, administering the district north of Florida and west to the Mississippi River. Investigate the guide above.
Homesteaders wouldn't have parted from Britain on the off chance that despite everything they required their insurance from the French (green), who'd blocked western extension in the Ohio Valley. Americans and Redcoats battled together against the French at the same time, as the maxim goes, recognition breeds disdain, and frontier local armies detested the hatred of their bosses in the British military.
All the more significantly, a few pilgrims didn't feel that they required the British any longer and the populace occupying these developing, asset rich states was for all intents and purposes self-chose for resistance to power, huge numbers of its pioneers having emigrated from the British Isles to look for more noteworthy opportunity.
They bristled under British endeavors to keep them close to the East Coast and squabbled about money-related issues in regards to duties and exchange. By 1763, the time had come to tidy off the Join, or Die. woodcut Ben Franklin had imprinted in 1754 to rally pilgrims in the interest of the British against the French; at the same time, this time, they were reviving against their very own rulers. More than 50,000 took part in the protest.
