Answer:
The system if equation that can be used to derive this are
6x + 4y = 69 AND
12x + y = 96
The price of a drink is $7.5
Step-by-step explanation:
The question here says that Taylor and Nora went to the movie theater and purchase refreshments for their friends. Taylor spends a total of $69.00 on 6 drinks and 4 bags of popcorn Nora spends a total of $96.00 on 12 drinks and bag of popcorn.And we are now told to write a system of equations that can be used to find the price of one drink and the price of one bag of popcorn. Using these equations,we should determine and state the price of a drink, to the nearest cent .
Now, Let's assume that the price of a drink is "X" and that of a bag of popcorn to be Y
The first person made a purchase which led to the equation
6x + 4y = 69______ equation 1
And the second person also made a purchase that lead to the equation
12x + y = 96_____ equation 2
We make y the subject of the formula in equation 2 and apply it in 1
Y = 96 - 12x
Now apply the above in equation 1
6x + 4y = 69
6x + 4(96 - 12x)= 69
6x + 384 - 48x = 69
42x = 384 - 69
X = 315/42
X = 7.5
Substitute x= 7.5 in equation 2
12x + y = 96
12(7.5) + y = 96
90 + y = 96
Y = 6
Therefore, the price of a drink is $7.5
1. C
2. A
3. B
3. D
Hope this helps
Here is your answer
A. 1,3,5,7,9,11,.....
REASON :
In an AP their is a common difference between two consecutive terms.
i.e. t2-t1=t3-t2=t4-t3=....= constant
The option A satisfies above condition.
HOPE IT IS USEFUL
Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
Answer:
-2 and 3
Step-by-step explanation:
These two are slopes. All three are technically slopes but a slope of 0 is just a horizontal line.
