Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

10

Ethan sold 2 3 gallon of lemonade. Kayla sold some lemonade too. Together, they sold 1 1 4 gallons. Who sold more lemonade, Etha

n or Kayla? How much more?

1 answer:

dezoksy [38]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Kayla sold more lemonade.

Step-by-step explanation

All you do to solve this problem is subtract 23 from 114.

You might be interested in

19. 140% of 60<br> find the percent of the number. Explain your method

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

84

Step-by-step explanation:

is x 140

---- SO ... ------- = --------

of 60 100

(hit like pls)

60*140=100x

8400=100x

/100 /100

-------------------

84 = x

8 0

2 years ago

Which of these steps will eliminate a variable in this system? help pls

Nataly [62]

The answer is B. Dbsjskkdjcjdks

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which graph shows the equation v=4+2t

ehidna [41]

You need to give options for future reference

5 0

3 years ago

How much money will she have if she doesn't buy any packs of baseball cards? $16 $18 $19 $20

GrogVix [38]

The amount of money that Carly would have left if she doesn't buy any packs of baseball cards is $20.

<h3>How to calculate the amount of money?</h3>

In order to calculate the amount of money that Carly would have left if she doesn't buy any packs of baseball cards, we would determine the cost of each baseball card as follows:

Let the cost of each baseball card be x.

Let the number of cards bought be n.

Translating the word problem into an algebraic expression, we have;

x - n = 16

x - 2n = 12

Solving the simultaneous equations by elimination, we have:

n = 4

Therefore, Carly's minimum balance is given by:

x - n = 16

x = 16 + n

x = 16 + 4

x = $20.

Read more on word problems here: brainly.com/question/13170908

#SPJ1

<u>Complete Question:</u>

The graph shows the relationship between the total amount of money that Carly will have left, y, if she buys x packs of baseball cards. How much money will she have if she doesn't buy any packs of baseball cards?

5 0

2 years ago

Tim Hortons is hiring and offers $200 every week plus $5 per hour. McDonalds offers $300 every week plus $2 per hour. State the

Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

Assuming you want better payment each week, any number of hours above 33.333 or 33 hours and 20 minutes per week

Step-by-step explanation:

There are several ways we could do this. We could say we want to have Tim Hortons be the better employer on the first week, or after so many weeks by adjusting the hours. I am going to assume we are saying we want it to be a better employer on the first week, so the profit will be the amount made every week plus the money made per hour times the number of hours.

Let's say number of hours is H

So Tim Hortons winds up as 200 + 5H for one week and Mcdonalds will be 300 + 2H.

If you set the two expressions equal to each other you will find where they intersect, which means at that number of hours they will give the same amount of money while any amount before one of the companies will give more and after that many hours the other will. Let's go ahead and solve.

200 + 5H = 300 + 2H

3H = 100

H = 100/3

So H is about 33.333. let's check.

200 + 5(33.333) = 366.665 which rounds to 366.67 dollars

300 + 2(33.333) = 366.666 which also rounds to 366.67 dollars

So at 33.333 hours both give 366.67 dollars. Let's look at a value below it, say 32.

200 + 5(32) = 360

300 + 2(32) = 364

So you can see here Tim Hortons pays less. Now we will try 34 as a value above 33.333

200 + 5(32) = 370

300 + 2(32) = 368

Here Mcdonalds pays less. This was to show that values below 33.333 make Tim Hortonspay less and values above 33.333 make Mcdonalds pay less. In other words any value above 33.333 hours will have Tim Hortons be the better employer. And this is per week

I want to repeat, you can expand this to be multiple weeks and see which of the two becomes better in that epriod of time. This was, I think, the simplest way to answer though.

So the conditions where Tim Horton pays more isif you work more than 33.333 hours per week. This will make them pay more every single week.

7 0

3 years ago