Answer:
"rules of origin"
Explanation:
An rule of origin is a criterion chosen by countries or regional blocks to characterize the origin of goods. The Rules of Origin have as their object the determination of the origin of a product, thus considered the place of manufacture or where it has received a substantial transformation. In trade agreements the rules of origin define the conditions under which an importing country may consider a product originating in an exporting country that is a member of that agreement and consequently receive preferential treatment, ie if it benefits from a partial or full reduction in import tax.
An example of a rule of origin can be seen in the question above, where certain textiles are made in the United States, shipped to other countries, combined in making apparel with textiles made in those other countries - and then re-exported back to the United States. States at a lower tariff rate.
Answer:
Republican Party
Explanation:
The republican party formed by Jefferson spilt into two groups by the 1820s, they were the national republican party that later changed their name to the Whig party and they competed for the white house with the democrats in 1840s and 1850s.
Two party system came into place and the two dominant party tried to avoid discussions around slavery. When the Whig coalition fell apart, the northern members of the group went to join the new Republican Party, and they went around opposing the extension of slavery into new territories at that time. Their campaign themes and set-up led to the election to Abraham Lincoln, who was the first U.S president to emerge from their party in 1860.
Answer:The fact that you "see" it is because you are having a flashbulb memory of where it was.
Explanation:
Flashbulb memory is memory in which we are able to recall something because we can see where it was before it passed.
In this case the lighting moves too fast for our eyes to see it but we can see the remnants of where it was before it passed .
The country most Buddhism now inhabits is China.
Continent:Asia
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars. Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically. (B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment. (C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants. (D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants. (E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable."
Answer:
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
Explanation:
Economic viability is able to reveal the degree of acceptance of consumers in relation to a specific product. This viability is important to understand how the product will be received in the market and how profitable or not it can be for those who produce it.
Economic viability is usually greater when the cost and benefit ratio of the product or service is favorable, however this is not always the case.
Regarding the use of solar energy, although technological changes have made the installation and equipment of this type of energy more cost-effective, these technological changes have also increased the efficiency of oil plants. As a result, the economic viability of solar energy has declined.