Answer:
0%
Explanation:
If input increase by 15% and output increase by 15% then the equation for productivity will be
Input = 100% + 15% = 115%
Output = 100% + 15% = 115%
Percentage change = 1-1
Percentage change = 0%
If both Output and input is increased by the same amount the results will be the same
Answer:
The issue is whether Joe is liable to pay for Bob to Avarice Bank or not.
Joe should prevail.
Explanation:
The original contract is between bank and Bob and in that contract Joe is not involved. Secondly payment on someone' behalf always has to be a written contract.
According to UCC, suretyships have to be written for them to be enforceable. This is mentioned in Statute of Frauds. It clearly states that any gurantee by thrid party for payment of debts has to be in writing.
Answer:
Top-down planning
Explanation:
Top-down planning -
It refers to the method planning , where the goals are bifurcated and placed according to the hierarchy from top to bottom , is referred to as top - down planning .
As breaking and arranging the goals , make the process to accomplish the goals in a better manner .
The process require the movement from higher level to lower level , in a very orderly manner to hasten the process .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is Top-down planning .
Answer:
$69,075
Explanation:
James Corporation
Merchandise remaining in James’s inventory:
$307,000 × 50% = $153,500
Intra-entity gross profit:
$153,500 × 45% = $69,075.
James’s ownership percentage of Carl will have no impact on this computation.
Therefore the amount of intra-entity gross profit in inventory at December 31 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is $69,075
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": The amount that would be paid today to receive a single amount at a specified date in the future.
Explanation:
The present value (PV) of a single sum tells us how much a future sum of money is worth today given a specified rate of return. This is an important financial concept based on the principle that money received in a specific time in the future is not worth as much as an equal sum received today.
