Was the United States justified in dropping the bombs on Japan to bring an end to the War in Asia?

History

2 answers:

Oliga [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

No. The attack on Pear Harbor was strategic, it wiped out military and water defense America had hold of. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not strategical. Furthermore, the bombs hardly took put any military bases or men in the battle. It just left millions without families and homes in a war they had no part of. They were forced to ration food and many of them had nothing in the end. If America wanted to act smart then we should have went for a military base. We destroyed all the aspects we work so hard on.

Explanation:

I studied these bombings and the aftermath and its not pretty unless you like hundreds of innocent children dead.

creativ13 [48]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on strategic cities. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

By 1850, what was the most common way to move freight?

ZanzabumX [31]

The Most Common Way to move freight by 1850, were Trains.

Quote:'From 1830-1860, Railroads appeared as the Main Means of Transportation.'

8 0

3 years ago

Jesus taught people to serve others when he told the _____ of the Good Samaritan

vekshin1

<h3>Jesus taught people to serve others when he told the story of the Good Samaritan</h3>

7 0

2 years ago