No. The attack on Pear Harbor was strategic, it wiped out military and water defense America had hold of. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not strategical. Furthermore, the bombs hardly took put any military bases or men in the battle. It just left millions without families and homes in a war they had no part of. They were forced to ration food and many of them had nothing in the end. If America wanted to act smart then we should have went for a military base. We destroyed all the aspects we work so hard on.
Explanation:
I studied these bombings and the aftermath and its not pretty unless you like hundreds of innocent children dead.
he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on strategic cities. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.
The constitution confers absolutely on the government of the Union, the powers of making war, and of making treaties (Treaties means "A formally concluded and ratified agreement between two countries.) Consequently, that government possesses the power or will of acquiring territory, either by conquest or treaty Marshall said. Hope this helps! if not please let me know
<span>One way that the </span>holocaust affect the Jewish population in Europe after world war 2 would be when the m<span>illions were left without families or homes. This was the huge affect that was being laid when the Jewish population in Europe had on affect after the WW2.</span>
