1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
8

Was the United States justified in dropping the bombs on Japan to bring an end to the War in Asia?

History
2 answers:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No. The attack on Pear Harbor was strategic, it wiped out military and water defense America had hold of. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not strategical. Furthermore, the bombs hardly took put any military bases or men in the battle. It just left millions without families and homes in a war they had no part of. They were forced to ration food and many of them had nothing in the end. If America wanted to act smart then we should have went for a military base. We destroyed all the aspects we work so hard on.

Explanation:

I studied these bombings and the aftermath and its not pretty unless you like hundreds of innocent children dead.

creativ13 [48]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on strategic cities. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Does anyone know number one.
KatRina [158]
B, boosted the morale of the patriots.
3 0
3 years ago
Based on your reading of these sections of the constitution does any part of the government have the legal authority to purchase
Anna007 [38]

The constitution confers absolutely on the government of the Union, the powers of making war, and of making treaties (Treaties means "A formally concluded and ratified agreement between two countries.) Consequently, that government possesses the power or will of acquiring territory, either by conquest or treaty Marshall said.  Hope this helps! if not please let me know

4 0
2 years ago
4.
Gekata [30.6K]
I say C is the awncer
3 0
2 years ago
Ratification is best defined as
yarga [219]

Answer:

b is the answer

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did the holocaust affect the Jewish population in Europe after world war 2?
BabaBlast [244]
<span>One way that the </span>holocaust affect the Jewish population in Europe after world war 2 would be when the m<span>illions were left without families or homes. This was the huge affect that was being laid when the Jewish population in Europe had on affect after the WW2.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When taking relevant notes on research, you should include all of the following EXCEPT: A. the source of the information B. any
    15·2 answers
  • What idea did E.D. Nixon have after Rosa Parks was arrested
    11·1 answer
  • The city referred to in this verse, For, behold, I have made thee this day a defenced city, and an iron pillar, and brasen walls
    12·1 answer
  • What is the most effective way for Congress to prevent a president's foreign policy? A. cut off budget support for that policy B
    11·2 answers
  • Explain how the role of the united states changed in global affairs during the progressive era
    11·1 answer
  • Colonial protests and boycotts against the stamp act eventually led to
    10·1 answer
  • Why do the Imperial Economies Matter
    5·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    8·2 answers
  • The Crusades began as effort to ________________________.
    7·1 answer
  • Secondary sources are valuable because they
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!