1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
8

Was the United States justified in dropping the bombs on Japan to bring an end to the War in Asia?

History
2 answers:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No. The attack on Pear Harbor was strategic, it wiped out military and water defense America had hold of. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not strategical. Furthermore, the bombs hardly took put any military bases or men in the battle. It just left millions without families and homes in a war they had no part of. They were forced to ration food and many of them had nothing in the end. If America wanted to act smart then we should have went for a military base. We destroyed all the aspects we work so hard on.

Explanation:

I studied these bombings and the aftermath and its not pretty unless you like hundreds of innocent children dead.

creativ13 [48]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

he made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on strategic cities. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the United States acquire the Hawaii territory?
stepan [7]
Due to the Spanish-American war in 1898, the United States needed a naval base in the Pacific and Hawaii was the perfect fit
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'm sorry to bother but can you guys help me on this question?
Sedbober [7]
Answer she most likely likes to read
3 0
3 years ago
Remember the alamo became a battle cry for americans in the war against mexico because
jonny [76]
So many Americans died in the Battle there
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did early farmers use slash-and-burn agriculture?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

Probably D.

Explanation:

Early farmers used the slash and burn agriculture to clear land so they can make it suitable for crops and livestock. (Sorry if it's wrong.)

8 0
3 years ago
Uiuioi9ioiopiopioi opiopiopiop iopiopi\
musickatia [10]

Answer:

46 years old

Explanation:

Marsha P. Johnson lived from August 24, 1945–July 6, 1992. That's 46 years.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What 2 types of cases have concurrent jurisdiction?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best reflects the cause for BOTH the fall of the western Roman empire and the fall of Han Chin
    15·1 answer
  • Choose the answer that lists three barbarian tribes that threatened the roman empire in the fourth and fifth centuries
    15·1 answer
  • What type of transportation was only used over short distances?
    9·2 answers
  • A factor that we can the US economy following is initial surge was The unequal distribution of
    10·1 answer
  • A historian is interested to learn whether or not a new biography about a Roman emperor is likely to be biased. Which of the fol
    10·2 answers
  • 8. How did the Americans make sure they paid no more than necessary?
    6·1 answer
  • What was one effect of these events on the 1828 presidential election?
    6·1 answer
  • As historians study history and create historical arguments, their view of history is shaped by their what?
    14·1 answer
  • Origins: 200,000 years ago
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!