Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
Answer: to catch the eye and to make merchandise look irresistible
Incontestability clause - This tells us the insurance company may not contest the validity of the policy during the insured's lifetime for any reason, including fraud, if the policy has been in effect for a predetermined duration
What is incontestability clause?
An incontestability clause in a life insurance policy safeguards the policyholder and forbids the insurer from changing any aspect of the insurance coverage as a result of a misinterpretation or false statements made by the insured (the policyholder) after a certain amount of time. A life insurance policy's provider cannot revoke any statement after a specified period of time thanks to an incontestability provision. This provision is frequently regarded as offering policyholders the most robust defense.
Learn more about insurance here:
brainly.com/question/16267577
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. firms have different costs.
Explanation:
A market might have an upward-sloping long-run supply curve if
a. firms have different costs.
b. consumers exercise market power over producers.
c. all factors of production are essentially available in unlimited supply.
d. the entry of new firms into the market has no effect on the cost structure of firms in the market.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true because the Federal Trade commission(FTC) analyze and investigate a seller or sellers who may be so cooperative as to make agreements that ensure large amounts of profit for them which is likely harmful and exploitative to consumers . FTC investigates business mergers which may be horizontal or vertical that are likely done for the purpose of increasing market share and fostering a sort of monopoly of the market. However, mergers and cooperation among businesses in the market do not always yield a monopoly and the FTC may be wrong(sometimes) to wave mergers that could increase the quality of goods or services in a market
