1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
4 years ago
5

Why did the gettysburg address have a long term impact?

History
1 answer:
Tomtit [17]4 years ago
4 0
In 1853, former United States president, Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address after the battle of Gettysburg where several lost their lives.

Lincoln dedicated a cemetery to those who died in the war. The Gettysburg Address has a long term impact and is considered one of the most influential speeches in history because it reminds people that human equality, freedom and justice are the most valuable for the United States and worth fighting for. The speech is a reminder that despite our race, background or wealth we are all created equally and should fight to maintain it. 
You might be interested in
What did the militia act mandate
nata0808 [166]
The Militia Act<span> of 1862, 12 Stat. 597, enacted July 17, 1862, was legislation enacted by the 37th United States Congress during the American Civil War that allowed African-Americans to participate as war laborers and soldiers for the first time since the </span>Militia Act<span> of 1792.


There u go

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the colonists criticize the stamp acts?
liq [111]
Are there any choices to choose from

4 0
3 years ago
Most of the major cities in the Middle East are located near what natural resource
Anton [14]
The correct answer is oil.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794 caused
NeX [460]

On this day in 1795, President George Washington signs the Jay (or “Jay’s”) Treaty with Great Britain.

This treaty, known officially as the “Treaty of Amity Commerce and Navigation, between His Britannic Majesty; and The United States of America” attempted to diffuse the tensions between England and the United States that had risen to renewed heights since the end of the Revolutionary War. The U.S. government objected to English military posts along America’s northern and western borders and Britain’s violation of American neutrality in 1794 when the Royal Navy seized American ships in the West Indies during England’s war with France. The treaty, written and negotiated by Supreme Court Chief Justice (and Washington appointee) John Jay, was signed by Britain’s King George III on November 19, 1794 in London. However, after Jay returned home with news of the treaty’s signing, Washington, now in his second term, encountered fierce Congressional opposition to the treaty; by 1795, its ratification was uncertain.

Leading the opposition to the treaty were two future presidents: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. At the time, Jefferson was in between political positions: he had just completed a term as Washington’s secretary of state from 1789 to 1793 and had not yet become John Adams’ vice president. Fellow Virginian James Madison was a member of the House of Representatives. Jefferson, Madison and other opponents feared the treaty gave too many concessions to the British. They argued that Jay’s negotiations actually weakened American trade rights and complained that it committed the U.S. to paying pre-revolutionary debts to English merchants. Washington himself was not completely satisfied with the treaty, but considered preventing another war with America’s former colonial master a priority.

Ultimately, the treaty was approved by Congress on August 14, 1795, with exactly the two-thirds majority it needed to pass; Washington signed the treaty four days later. Washington and Jay may have won the legislative battle and averted war temporarily, but the conflict at home highlighted a deepening division between those of different political ideologies in Washington, D.C. Jefferson and Madison mistrusted Washington’s attachment to maintaining friendly relations with England over revolutionary France, who would have welcomed the U.S. as a partner in an expanded war against England.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dr. Benjamin Carson exemplifies which character technique?
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:Yes its D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did the Lend-Lease Act allow?
    5·1 answer
  • "For the last few months, you and I have enjoyed a relationship based on extraordinary cooperation. Because of this cooperation
    5·2 answers
  • Which of he following increased tension between amrica and the soviet union after world war 2
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Eastern Roman Empire’s geography support its population?
    11·2 answers
  • What did the Corps of Discovery set out to do?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the battle campaign of great bridge battle
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements does not describe a characteristic of boom towns?
    11·2 answers
  • What might have been the best way for someone living in Leipzig to escape to Munich.
    14·1 answer
  • How could countries in the south overcome the income gap that divides the north from the south​
    13·1 answer
  • What four ideas did the Council of Trent allow the Catholic bishops and cardinals to agree upon?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!