The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
Inductive reasoning is seen as a kind of a process or a method that is known to be used in the drawing of conclusions.
This can be done by going from a particular point to a general point and it is known to be one that is often contrasted with deductive reasoning.
Therefore, based on the above, The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
Learn more about reasoning from
brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be the word AUTOMATISM. <span>Robert Motherwell was influenced by the surrealist concept of automatism, </span><span>which incorporates intuition, spontaneity, and the accidental when creating artwork. Hope this answer helps. </span>
Answer:
It is important to preserve our cultural heritage, because it keeps our integrity as a people. The importance of intangible cultural heritage is not the cultural manifestation itself but rather the wealth of knowledge and skills that is transmitted through it from one generation to the next.
Explanation:
Please Mark me brainliest
I believe the answer is: heterogeneous
According to piaget, heterogeneous morality refers to the perception of right or wrong without considering the intentions of all party involved.
in the example, Abby just automatically assume that she's wrong even if she does not understand the intentions of the cop.<span />
