In ________, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.

Social Studies

1 answer:

astra-53 [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Dred Scott v Sanford

Explanation:

In <u>Dred Scott v Sanford</u>, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.

In the Dred Scott v Sanford case, Dred Scott a black American who had lived an a territory were slavery had been banned sued for his freedom arguing that since he had lived in illinois and Wisconsin, both free territory, he was a free man. However, the court ruled that he was still a slave, the Supreme court corroborated the ruling of the lesser court that he was still a slave and therefore had no legal right and cannot sue.

You might be interested in

How can social problem be minimized?

USPshnik [31]

Answer:

by not overreacting on small things

8 0

2 years ago

WHICH BIOME HAS LEAVES THAT CHANGE COLORS FALL OFFS AS WINTER APPROACHES

Semmy [17]

A. Temperate

If you've seen fall leaves before, you're in a temperate biome.

7 0

2 years ago

There were many important results of the civil war . Which do you think was the most important and why

Ivan

Its is to end slavery because of troubles

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Changes in the economy and the increase in inequality in the United States have led to a variety of popular responses. One of th

aleksklad [387]

Answer: D. Bridging

Explanation:

BRIDGING SOCIAL CAPITAL is one part of Social Capital as opined by Robert Putnam with the other being BONDING.

Bridging Social Capital describes a connection between people that hail from different demographics in a society such as race, class, religion, etc. It in effect refers to connections that 'bridge' communities together.

The Occupy Wall Street movement brought people together regardless of their social designation hence it being BRIDGING.

8 0

2 years ago

True or false: less than 4 percent of presidential nominees to the supreme court have been rejected by the senate on grounds of

belka [17]

It is false that less than 4 percent of presidential nominees to the supreme court have been rejected by the senate on grounds of judicial qualification, legal views, personal ethics, or partisanship.

What is meant y presidential nominee?

This is used to refer to the fact that a person wants to run for the highest office in the United States, This is done by the scrutiny that the congress would want to put in place on that person.

The United States is known to have its great nation to be built on the ideals of freedom and one of this is the freedom of speech. Hence the lawmakers would not disqualify based on the fact that a person is partisan.

Read more on presidential nominee here: brainly.com/question/2515387

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago