Answer:
History books portray him as a brutal emperor who massacred millions of Asian and Eastern European people. However, he also practiced religious and racial tolerance, and his Mongolian Empire valued the leadership of women. Khan also brought law and civilization to Mongolia and is regarded as a hero in his native land. So technically he is neither a villain or a hero.
They strove for a moral society.
John of Damascus was the most ardent defender of icons. Iconoclasts, meaning "icon breakers" were those who were against the practice. They feared it would lead to idolatry, forbidden by the bible. He wrote many amounts of writings on the topic of icons that remains today.
A claim that is made by Meeropol in the excerpt is that some Americans saw the election of Bill Clinton as repudiation.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim simply means the main argument that's in a literary work. It's the authors stance regarding an issue.
In this case, some Americans saw the election of Bill Clinton as repudiation. The historical development illustrated by the excerpt is the abolishment of the federal guarantee of entitlement and turning AFDC over to the states.
Learn more about claims on:
brainly.com/question/13628349
Yes
it left the anti-federalist at ease regarding the ratification of the constitution, in which originally not giving them rights they wanted
<span>the bill of rights giving the people freedom of religion, speech and the press; the right to bear arms and to be tried by a jury; and the right to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances</span>
