Answer:
opportunistic
Explanation:
<u>A person who is deemed to be opportunistic is thought to take opportunities that are presented to them regardless of their principles or previous stances on the said matter.</u> The opportunistic people look up the circumstance and take the way that is best possible for themselves, using all the advantages they can. This adjective can often be tied to politicians or businessmen that are considered to be strategic.
<u>Credulous </u>is a person ready to believe anything as the truth. <u>Disdainful </u>means to show respect to someone. <u>Proactive </u>means the person is actively participating in the situation and readily working towards the goal.
What accurately describes the relationship between the ideas is that the Sentence 2 provides supporting evidence for the reason stated in sentence 1.
<h3>What are the two statement?</h3>
- Consuming too much sugar can lead to dangerous medical conditions.
- People may develop obesity, tooth decay, or adult-onset diabetes.
Hence, the relationship between the ideas is that the Sentence 2 provides supporting evidence for the reason stated in sentence 1.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about supporting evidence
<em>brainly.com/question/9049627</em>
#SPJ1
People are using the internet more than ever. New apps are coming out everyday and people are using them. Instagram is a great app do market/promote on because so many people are using it. You could post an ad on a streetlight and the exact same add on Instagram and the sales between the two would be very different. Social media and internet is a commonly used thing. With so many people on it, someone will see what you're marketing and want it. <span />
Answer:
She gives a rebuttal with support.
Explanation:
A rebuttal refers to a response to an opponent's counterclaim, addressing the counterclaim and arguing why the opponent's argument is not solid, and disproving it with evidence.
In this case the following comment is a counterclaim by an opponent who disagrees with the authors original argument: "We need to encourage kids to get more exercise. New sports facilities would inspire kids to get outside more and get moving. I’m all for it. "
The author responds to the above counterclaim by providing the following rebuttal with evidence to support it: "Exercise is good, no doubt about that, but you don’t need it from sports facilities or team sports. The Sequoia Nature Preserve has miles of paths where people walk, even jog. And when kids are walking in the forest, they area also breathing cleaner air and the surroundings are peaceful—it’s a healthy environment for people to get exercise and just get away from city life.
