Answer: they protect buyers and suppliers or manage scarce resources during difficult economic times.
Explanation: Price floors and price ceilings are government-imposed minimums and maximums on the price of certain goods or services.
Whats the question i'm happy to help
Considering the available options, the approach that SPECIFICALLY involves using compensation is "<u>buying books on tape as a backup for the times when reading is too difficult."</u>
The <u>compensation approach</u> in reading is the approach one used or employed to compensate for the traditional method.
In this case, buying books on tape as a backup is to listen to is an approach to compensating for the times; he found reading books difficult.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>buying books on tape as a backup for the times when reading is too difficult."</u>
The available options are the following:
A) cutting down on other activities that are less vital in hanks life.
B) buying books on tape as a backup for the times when reading is to difficult
C) deciding to read during the morning when hank tends to be most alert
D) reading complex books to stretch his skills
Learn more about reading strategies here: brainly.com/question/25030145
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Exclusive right-to-sell is defined as selling process in which broker is provided with commission irrespective of the person who puts efforts to sell the property i.e.- broker or owner of property .This is process is carried in contractual form.
According to the question,exclusive right-to-sell agreement is doen between Rick and Paul where Paul will get commission regardless of the person who sells the property.
Thus, the given statement is true.
