1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondaur [170]
3 years ago
13

What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
3 0
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
You might be interested in
What kind of law deals with issues between the federal government and states, between two or more states, and between the govern
Naily [24]

Answer:

Federalism

Power is first divided between the national, or federal government, and the state and local government under a system known as Federalism. At the federal level, the Constitution again divides power between the three major branches of our federal government—the legislative, the executive, and the judicial.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During Freedom Summer: Select one: a. very few white college students participated. b. only black activists participated in the
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

Freedom summer or Mississippi Summer Project was the project raised to increase the black voter registration in Mississippi in 1964. The project was sponsored by civil rights organisation.

The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee also helped in the project.

This project was opposed by policemen, state and authorities also.

So, the correct answer is option D.

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this answer!
defon

B) Egypt    That would be my guess

3 0
4 years ago
According to Article I of the U.S. Constitution, only the
skad [1K]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Article One of the United States Constitution. Article One of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the United States Congress. Under Article One, Congress is a bicameral legislature consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did young people help bring about reform in Eastern Europe?
Nikitich [7]

The young people help bring about reforms in eastern Europe because they stopped supporting communist governments.

<h3>What do you mean by reforms?</h3>

A reform movement refers to the type of social movement that particularly aims to bring changes in the community.

Reforms in eastern Europe spread rapidly just because most people in these countries supported democratization. They stopped supporting communist governments.

Therefore, B is the correct option.

Learn more about reforms here:

brainly.com/question/2396597

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ is based on the principles of social learning theory.
    9·1 answer
  • How much is a dollar in Mexico
    15·1 answer
  • A demand-forecasting technique used to maximize room revenue is known as A. Return on Investment B. Revenue management C. Upsell
    10·1 answer
  • Which culture do you think has the most influence in Ecuador: Native, African or European?
    7·1 answer
  • express your views on how the law , the citizen and community can protect and support victims of human rights violation​
    14·1 answer
  • What do you mean by democratic culture?<br>​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following improvements is a Song agricultural improvement?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements demonstrate why it is important to practice maintaining one's attention during the
    6·2 answers
  • One potential explanation for the finding that gifted students who are integrated into regular classrooms have more positive aca
    5·1 answer
  • Kiko still thinks of herself as a struggling student although as a college student her gpa is a 3. 5. this is an example of_____
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!