<h2>
Answer:</h2>
x = (log₅7) - 8
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
<em>Given;</em>
= 7
<em>Take log of both sides;</em>
log₁₀() = log₁₀7 -------------(ii)
<em>From the laws of logarithm remember that;</em>
logₐ xⁿ = n logₐ x
<em>Equation (ii) can then be written as;</em>
(x + 8)log₁₀5 = log₁₀7
<em>Divide both sides by log₁₀5</em>
(x + 8) = 
-----------(iii)
<em>From the laws of logarithm, remember that;</em>
<em>Equation (iii) can thus be written as;</em>
(x + 8) = log₅7
x + 8 = log₅7
<em>Make x subject of the formula;</em>
x = (log₅7) - 8
Answer:
The answer is B. -97.7.
Explanation:
As the question gives us the spot rate, the interest rates of two countries, We can apply the covered interest parity to calculate the 90-day forward exchange rate JPY/AUD from which 90-day forward points can be derived.
F = S x ( 1+ Rjpy) / ( 1+ Raud); in which Rjpy denoted as JPY interest rate ( 0.15% per annum) while Raud is AUD interest rate ( 4.95% per annum).
F = 82.42 x (1+ 0.15% x 90/360) / ( 1 + 4.95% x 90/360) = 81.443
=> The 90-day forward points is : 100 x ( F-S) = 100 x ( 81.443 - 82.42) = -97.7
Unregulated clothing varies considerably in ability to block ultra violate rays. The SPF fabrics range from 2 polyester blouse to 1000 cotton twill jeans. A typical dry white cotton t shirt has SPF of 5 to 9. The most important factors for determining SPF are tightness of the weave and the actual.
Answer:
The answer is: The Principle of Deontology
Explanation:
By making this decision (installing the MOB technology) the CEO follows the Principle of Deontology.
Deontology dictates that actions are right or wrong by themselves, not by their consequences or the virtues of the person doing them. An action is "right" if it follows a moral norm or a set of rules.
In this case, the CEO believes that installing the MOB technology is the right thing to do because it saves lives. He doesn´t care if it costs a lot of money or if it may cause some trouble and delays to the ships´ operations.
shows that he is made his decision based on the Concern for Others case it would be specifically concern for his customers and employees (they can also fall off the ship). He really cares about his customers and employees, and wants to accomplish his business goals but he is not willing to risk their lives while doing so. He is convinced that it is his responsibility to ensure the well being of all the passengers in his cruise ships.
I would say the retailer violated the contract because natural disasters you can't control in any way. There is nothing you can do to stop it if it happens. The reason I would say that the retailer is at fault is because they made a conscious decision to change up companies.
