Answer:
On the one hand, the moral of The Bundle of Sticks, reflects on the idea that "union makes strength": when each of the sons tried to break the entire bundle of sticks, no one was able to do it. Therefore, the dying father tells them: "untie the bundle and each of you take a stick", so the sons were finally able to break the sticks, by breaking them individually, but in the end, through the union of the brother's forces, altogether.
On the other hand, the moral of "Hofus the stonecutter", refers to how people unecessarily want to be superior in hierarchy in society. The tale shows how a stonecutter always wishes to become someone or something superior than him, for instance, when he sees that the cloud is stronger than the sun (when he was the sun), so he wishes to be "the storm". But in the end, he realizes the stonecutter was the strongest of all.
Explanation:
hmu if yah need more help! :)
Answer:
<h3>When they understood and learned more about the lives of Calpurnia, Boo Radley and Tom Robinson.</h3>
Explanation:
- Scout and Jem began to see life from other people's perspective when they understood and learned more about the lives of Calpurnia, Boo Radley and Tom Robinson.
- At first, they thought that they were forced to listen to Calpurnia and felt that she was tyrannical. But once they realized how life was hard for Calpurnia, they soon understood the efforts made by Calpurnia to survive as an Africa-American was not easy.
- Secondly, Scout and Jem realized that Boo was not as bad as they thought to be. They realized that they were wrong in their judgement and that Boo Radley was, in fact, a good person.
- And finally when Scout understood what life was like for Tom Robinson, Scout realized that the society where she lived was corrupted and evil. After learning more about the lives of Calpurnia, Boo Radley and Tom Robinson, Scout and Jem become more mature and understanding than they were before.
Answer:
This is a reliable news report providing an objective, verifiable summary of events.
The anmswer to this question is B.
Answer: Both authors are against the soda ban.
