Development states and making a personal investment in attaining that identity.
James Marcia's developmental theory believes that identity arises from the set of choices people usually make during adolescence. These choices about ideology, profession, relationships, hobbies, and gender that one has incorporated into one's identity are subject to conflict and attachment.
Marcia (1966) based on Ericsson's (1950/1980) psychosocial identity development theory of adolescent identity development, four identities: identity diffusion, identity partitioning, identity moratorium, and identity acquisition. The state has been identified.
(2005) empirically derives an identity status similar to that described by Marcia (1966). They develop both commitment and exploration in two forms each, distinguishing the next four dimensions of identity. Commitment creation, commitment identification, width exploration, and depth exploration and making personal investment.
Learn more about personal investment at
brainly.com/question/3729664
#SPJ1
Answer:
Elaboration likelihood model
Explanation:
Elaboration likelihood model is defined as a theory of persuasion that suggested that persuasive messages has a kind of leverage on individuals' attitudes by two different routes, central or peripheral.
It further stated that, in a situation where by there is high motivation and ability to process messages, the individual involved often go the central route. However, when such individual has neither motivation or the ability to process the message, there is tendency to take the peripheral route.
Hence, According to ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL, people are more likely to carefully evaluate a persuasive message when their motivational state is high, and when they have the ability or knowledge to evaluate the information.
Answer:
none because am pretending
Explanation:
Answer:
The Court decided that as long as the States kept the racially separate facilities equal, then they weren't violating the Constitution.
Explanation:
The Court saw it as follows:
If racially segregated facilities were equal in quality then no harm was being done. As they thought, segregation was NOT discrimination.