Answer: I am so sorry i'm stumped
Explanation:
Answer:
They wanted King William and Queen Mary to accept the bill of rights so that the people would be more in control of the government and have rights. Another reason is so that a future monarch could not rule cruelly over the people. The bill of rights kept the monarch in check.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. The Brown Party: This party is seen to be more likely to turn the Uhuru into a client state of the Soviet Union because of its desire to be near to other countries. Also, the party wants to invest in other foreign nations. An interest to work with the Soviet Union will be as a result of the party's desire to work with other nations.
2. The Green Party: This party faction is more likely to set up a pro-Western government because of its focus on agriculture. Also, under the Central Government, its desire is to nationalize the utilities, agriculture, even the mining industries.
The Green Party also desires to stay neutral in the Cold War. This is seen as the best for the United States because they will not get involved with other nations.
3. Supporting the Brown Party with soft power will result to better and fruitful negotiations with other nations. This is because it wants close relationships with those nations. Such a decision might not work due to the fact that when a country is working out agreements with other countries, it can be sometimes be hard or difficult. Also, it can take up too much time.
While supporting Brown Party with hard power could result to more development in weapons and also lead to an increase in tensions resulting to war.
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
All three cases went to the Supreme Court for ruling, is the right answer.
Plessy V. Ferguson was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court approved the segregation sponsored by the state, so far as it related to public education.
Similarly, the lawsuit Brown v. Board of Education was a milestone in the cases heard by the Supreme Court of the U.S. In this instance, the Supreme Court declared state laws putting separate government schools for black and white kids to be illegal.
Like the above two cases, the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was also a milestone ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. It sustained affirmative action, providing race to be one of many constituents in the college admission procedure. Nevertheless, the Supreme court commanded that specific ethnic ration, for instance, the 16 out of 100 positions placed escape for students with minority by Davis School of Medicine, the University of California, were impermissible
In this way, the all the three cases were ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States.
