Answer:
future value
Explanation:
Future value is the value of a sum of money at some point in the future given a certain interest rate.
Formula for future value = present value x ( 1 + r )^n
Assuming i = 10
the future value of $100 in 5 years = 100 x ( 1.1)^5 = $161.05
Answer:
The answer is: C) The money spent on health care in the United States is not being used effectively.
Explanation:
American citizens spend twice as much as British citizens on health care per year. Even if certain diseases are more common in the US than in Britain, the overall cost of health care is too expensive in the US (100% difference) to be explained by a greater prevalence of just one or two diseases.
The only possible explanation is that the American health care system is not as efficient as the British health care system, therefore health care is more expensive.
Answer: a. The patent is an intangible so it is amortized for cost recovery
Explanation:
Just as Depreciation exists for the wearing and tearing of tangible Assets, so does AMORTIZATION exist for Intangible Assets like goodwill, patents, licenses, copyrights and logos.
It follows essentially the same process as Depreciation and the useful life estimation is usually discretionary because some Intangible Assets can give benefits forever such as logos.
Generally though, only Intangible Assets with estimable useful lives are amortized such as Patents and Trademarks.
There are 1560 ways
Explanation:
The toal number of restaurants are 8, out of which 3 serve seafood, and during the summer gateway, Jason decided to dine out at 4 multifarious restaurants.
Since, the order is significant, permutations is to be used.
Four restaurants can be chosen from the 8 restaurants in 
. In this case, "at least one" is complement of "fewer than one" (that is 0). Thus, four restaurants that are not serving seafood can be chosen from five restaurants in 
.
<u>Using complements principle to get the number of ways to get at least one of the restuarants serve seafood,</u>
= 1680-120
= 1560
Therefore, there are 1560 ways
Answer:
B) Hillward can sue Hobert since the logo has been used by Hillward and is associated with it.
Explanation:
Since Hillwards logo is an elaborate piece of creative art, then they can sue Hobert for using their logo since it was associated directly to them during the past decade. Common logos are not usually protected by copyright unless they show significant creative artwork done.
It is always better and easier to protect a logo when it is a registered trademark but even if you haven't registered it you can still sue and win for infringement. When a company uses a logo, especially for a long time, it is establishing common law trademark rights.
