Step-by-step explanation:
a. The null hypothesis is generally an exact value and the alternative hypothesis is the one we are trying to show. We are trying to show that the population mean is different from $24.57, so the hypotheses are as follows:
Null: The population mean hourly wage in the manufacturing industry is the same as the population mean hourly wage in the goods-producing industries
Alternative: The population mean hourly wage in the manufacturing industry differs from the population mean hourly wage in the goods-producing industries
b.
Because we know the population standard deviation, we can use a z test
Plugging in the values:
Expected population mean: 24.57
Sample average: 23.89
Sample size: 30
Population standard deviation: 2.4, we get 0.1207 as our p-value.
c. Using a = 0.05, our p-value is greater than that, so we can not conclude the alternative hypothesis (The population mean hourly wage in the manufacturing industry differs from the population mean hourly wage in the goods-producing industries)
d. Using a critical value calculator, we can find that for a two-tailed approach, the critical value would be 1.96. This would mean that the z score would have to be greater than 1.96 or less than -1.96 for the results to be significant. The population mean we would plug in here is 24.57, while the raw score would be 23.89 and the standard deviation would be 2.4. The z score we get is -0.283, which is not in the values specified (>1.96 or <-1.95) so we cannot conclude the alternative hypothesis
Peekaroo2007 can u help me with my recent question pls!
Part (a)
<h3>Answer: y1 and y3 are perpendicular</h3>
This is because the two slopes 2 and -1/2 multiply to -1. Perpendicular slopes multiply to -1 assuming neither line is vertical or horizontal.
=====================================================
Part (b)
Graph each line to see where they cross. The three points of intersection are
(0,4)
(2,-2)
(4,2)
The order of the points doesn't matter.
You could also form three systems of equations pairing up the equations, and solving each system. That way you can find the points of intersection. Graphing may be a better and faster route in my opinion. See the diagram below.
Answer: The first option.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. The formula for calculate the perimeter is:
P=2l+2w
Where l is the lenght and w is the width.
2. The first perimeter is:
3. If you multiply the dimension by a scale of factor of 2, is the same as write the following expression:
Where is the first perimeter.
4. Then:
Answer:
More than half I think its based off of a 1-10% scale
Step-by-step explanation:
it's greater than 5%