Answer:
False
Explanation:
Purchasing power is related to real income and not to nominal income. Even though workers had a $10 increase in their average nominal income, due to the effects of inflation, that increase does not necessarily reflect an improve in purchasing power.
The statement is false.
Answer:
Beta= 1.5
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the proportional investment of each asset:</u>
Total investment= $100,000
BOA= 30,000/100,000= 0.3
Best Buy= 20,000/100,000= 0.2
Harley-Davidson= 50,000/100,000= 0.5
<u>To calculate the beta of the portfolio, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Beta= (proportion of investment A*beta A) + (proportion of investment B*beta B)...
Beta= (0.3*1.8) + (0.2*1.05) + (0.5*1.5)
Beta= 1.5
Answer:
In the description section underneath the overview per the particular context is illustrated.
Explanation:
- Wanda's philosophy about becoming a distributer of enhance performance resulted in increased market demand due to consumer perception that her goods are stronger and therefore more advantageous.
- This contributes to consumption growth, moving the consumer surplus towards Wanda's goods to the right, contributing towards increased costs.
- One more scenario maybe though in the immediate future, her Wanda commodities demonstrate no positive effects, resulting throughout a decline in terms of trade.
Throughout this situation, Wanda might answer by genuinely changing the productivity of the latter's goods including displaying a certain clinical significance to obtain a competitive advantage for customers.