Answer:
1. The benefit is that is passes the general message in a surreal manner, the intended message is passed but with a little sense of wit and humor which would create a soft landing on the readers mind without taking away the seriousness of the message passed.
2. Michael risks losing the attention of a few sentimental sect i.e, poor people that feel the joke was not necessary and that shots were taken at them. Not everyone is humorous.
3. The message would still be effective regardless only that, the humor embedded won;t be present and readers that love such would feel what was written was too serious lol.
4. 'The wounded eagle glided as fast as a kite in a storm', this implied that the manner with which the eagle was gliding down, it look as though it was a kite basking in the euphoria of the wind. In a serious tone, it can go like this; 'The wounded eagle quickly sought a resting place'.
Second example is ' Chelsea broke the bones of Manchester United like she was the grim reaper'. With a serious tone; 'Chelsea won Manchester United squarely'
5. Changing the tone made the argument more serious and focused on the intending point.
6. Not necessarily, it all depends on the reader but these days, authors try to spice up stories with a little bit of humor to ensure the attention of their readers stays intact and to also eliminate any chance of boredom.
Answer:
answers are ADE and F
Explanation:
the correct answer is ADE and F
Proverbial The Polytheism
Written by IMAGO (Viwe Lugongolo)
<span>It's jungle out there:
howls and roars
Love is in the air,
now is the time to soar.
My self-slavery is of my free will,
When it comes to the heart-
it's either steal or be still.
I won't let you,
out off my sight,
The window begins to cry-
feeling ostracized.
</span>
<span><span>Please take the
time to rate, pick the Brainliest answer (not necessarily mine!), and thank me if you feel I
helped with this question! Thank you, it helps me a lot. :)</span>
</span>
Answer:
<h2>C. </h2><h2>Strikebreakers
</h2>
I hope this helps
Answer:
Pluralist Theory is a theory which states that a mass of groups can bring change or impact policies of the USA, instead of only one party or group. The second citizen is saying exactly that, he claims that many different perspectives of competing groups will bring about only policies acceptable to a consensus of the citizenry. So, we can conclude from his beliefs that the second citizen believes in the political theory of <u>Pluralist Theory.</u>
