Answer: The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%
Explanation:
Currently, from last year to the current year, there has been a 16% increase change in the exchange rate and a 6.667% change in the price. The exchange rate pass through is 41.7 = 6.666666667%÷16%
For every increase in 1% of the exchange rate, there has been a 41.7% increase in the current price of the DVD player.
Individuals differ in risk aversion because of differences in income or wealth.
- Risk aversion is the propensity of people to choose outcomes with low uncertainty over those with high uncertainty, even when the average outcome of the latter is equal to or higher in monetary worth than the more definite event. This tendency is shown in both economics and finance.
- Risk aversion is the tendency to avoid danger. A risk-averse investor is one who prioritizes money preservation over the potential for a higher-than-average return. Price volatility and investment risk are the same.
- If someone would rather take the risk and maybe receive nothing than accept a definite payment (certainty equivalent) of less than $50 (for instance, $40), they are considered to be risk averse. If they have no preference between the wager and a specific $50 payoff, they are risk neutral.
Thus the correct answer is d.
Refer here to learn more about risk aversion: brainly.com/question/8394406
#SPJ4
Early personal computer users remember the cumbersome, user-unfriendly "DOS" system. When Apple introduced System 1 and Microsoft introduced Windows, both of which were much easier to use, these new products diffused rapidly because of their relative advantage
.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
A product's dominance and market appeal over similar items. A competitive advantage is usually accomplished by giving better value to customers through either reducing prices or delivering added quality and service that justify higher costs.
That idea is based on consumer brand and product perceptions and does not necessarily reflect the actual characteristics of this product or service. The definition helps companies to consider that customers would choose to use this product or whether a rival would rather remain faithful to the already existing product.
Correct question:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is _________ correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Group of answer choices
A. less efficient than
B. as efficient as
C. either more or less depending on the elasticity of demand
D. more efficient than
Answer:
Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
<h3>Correcting a market with taxation:</h3>
- The government can discourage the consumption of harmful products by raising taxes on them.
- Cigarette and alcohol taxes, for example, are raised on a regular basis to discourage their consumption and limit their adverse impacts on unconnected third parties.
<h3>Command and control strategies:</h3>
- Command and control is a sort of environmental regulation that allows policymakers to expressly regulate both the amount and the procedure by which a company should maintain environmental quality.
- Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
<h3>Reason -</h3>
As it is stated above Correcting marketing is more effective than correcting manufacturing through taxation.
Therefore, Correcting a market with an externality through taxation is (A) less effective than correcting it through a set output target from command and control.
Know more about market correction here:
brainly.com/question/2626419
#SPJ4
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
