Correct answer choice is:
D. Accident investigation.
Explanation:
An accident investigation is a method of concluding the source cases of accidents, on-the-job damages, resources destruction, and alike notes in classification to stop them from happening repeatedly.
When conflicts are reviewed, the importance should be focused on determining the root reason of the occurrence so you can block the event from occurring again. The goal is to find evidence that can direct to remedial activities, not to determine responsibility. Constantly look for distant causes.
Answer:
total = total + amount
Explanation:
The statement that increments total by the value associated with amount i.e add the value associated with amount to that associated with total and assign the result to total is:
total = total + amount
Answer:
I have formulated the answer in the table and the table is attached in the attachment please refer to the attachment 1.
Explanation:
<em>Please refer to the attachment 1. And here is the explanation</em>
Inherited property is the property which is transferred to ones beloved after she/he passes away or makes a will, so statement A, E and F are inherited properties.
Purchased property are the ones that one acquires after paying certain price of the good, so B is purchased property.
Abandoned property is the goods or intangible thing left somewhere and the owner is not known, so statement C and D are abandoned properties.
<em></em>
Answer:
D)reducing its need to be self-sufficient,
Explanation:
Specialisation by a country's economy means that it produces only the specialised goods & even export it, import the other goods.
It decreases opportunity costs, decreases cost of voluntary exchanges. Higher level of specialisation implies there is increased labor force division.
However, it reduces need of country to be self sufficient. As, it can gainfully trade its specialised goods for other goods (in which other economy specialises).
This is an example of<u> "deductive reasoning".</u>
Deductive reasoning is a coherent procedure in which a conclusion depends on the concordance of numerous premises that are commonly thought to be valid.
Deductive reasoning is sometimes alluded to as top-down logic. Its partner, inductive thinking, is some of the time alluded to as base up rationale. Where deductive thinking continues from general premises to an explicit end, inductive thinking continues from explicit premises to a general end.
