Answer:
Portfolio Beta = 1.2815
Explanation:
given data
market value = $3,000,000
portfolio beta = 1.6
sells = 25
times index = $10
currently trading = 15379
to find out
anticipates that this hedge will reduce the portfolio beta to
solution
we get number of contract to sell is here
number of contract to sell = Portfolio Beta ×
......................1
put here value we get
25 = Portfolio Beta × 
solve it we get
Portfolio Beta = 1.2815
Answer:
The answers are:
- $80,000
- $80,000
Explanation:
The nominal GDP includes all the production of final and legal products and services. The real GDP is the nominal GDP adjusted to inflation.
Peg's contribution to nominal GDP in 2015 was $80,000 (4,000 nail sets x $20 per nail set). If 2015 was the base year, in this case real GDP is the same as nominal GDP.
Answer:
III. If a competitive industry is in long-run equilibrium, a decrease in demand causes firms to earn negative profit because the market price will fall below average total cost.
Explanation:
A perfect competition is characterised by many buyers who sell homogenous products.
All firms in a perfect competition earn zero economic profit in the long run because there are no barriers to entry or exit.
In the long run, equilibrium occurs at: P = LMC = LATC
If demand falls, prices would fall below average total cost and the firm would earn negative profit .
Complete Question:
Determine the utilization and the efficiency for each of these situations:
a. A loan processing operation that processes an average of 7 loans per day. The operation has a design capacity of 10 loans per
day and an effective capacity of 8 loans per day.
b. A furnace repair team that services an average of four furnaces a day if the design capacity is six furnaces a day and the
effective capacity is five furnaces a day.
c. Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than
those other systems? Explain.
Explanation:
It's not (true) actually. Whether the design capacity is comparatively (high), the utilisation could be (low) even though the efficiency was (high).
Utilisation = Output / Design capacity =
x 100%
Efficiency = Output / Effective capacity = 
Utilisation = 
Efficiency = 
U = 1000/2000
e = 1000/1000
Not sure about this answer I will think about it