1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
3 years ago
15

1.Dred Scott was the plaintiff (the person who sued the defendant) in this case. Why did he sue the Emersons and John Sanford? W

hat was his goal?
2.Summarize the basic argument that Scott's lawyers used to support his case. Did Dred Scott have reason to believe that he would win his case?
3.Why was a new case brought to the federal court system? What circumstances made the case a federal question?
4.How do you think the bitter political climate of the day affected Dred Scott's chances of winning his case?
History
1 answer:
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

idk if im supposed to anwer 1 or all

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP!!!!!!What is judicial review?
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.

Explanation:in other words A

8 0
3 years ago
What groups of people were included in the Common Council in article 14? What groups were left out?
nignag [31]

Answer:

Representatives of the clergy and members of the nobility would be the people who would be part of the Common Council, while peasants and ordinary people would be left out.

Explanation:

The Common Council was the body created, through the magma letter, to limit the action of the king and act as a type of parliament capable of managing and administering the country in several categories. This council was formed by members of the clergy, such as archbishops, bishops, abbots, counts and great barons of the kingdom; and, by members of royalty. However, ordinary citizens like peasants were left out, which means that they had no kind of representation that could be positive towards them.

6 0
3 years ago
The powerful mayor of Chicago during the 1968 democratic convention was __
LenKa [72]
Richard J. Daley: hope it helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Truman want to stop MacArthur from going into North Korea
Alex

On 11 April 1951, U.S. President Harry S. Truman relieved General of the Army Douglas MacArthur of his commands after MacArthur made public statements which contradicted the administration's policies. MacArthur was a popular hero of World War II who was then the commander of United Nations forces fighting in the Korean War, and his relief remains a controversial topic in the field of civil-military relations.

MacArthur led the Allied forces in the Southwest Pacific during World War II, and after the war was in charge of the occupation of Japan. When North Korea invaded South Korea in June 1950, starting the Korean War, he was designated commander of the United Nations forces defending South Korea. He conceived and executed the amphibious assault at Inchon on 15 September 1950, for which he was hailed as a military genius. However, when he followed up his victory with a full-scale invasion of North Korea on Truman's orders, China intervened in the war and inflicted a series of defeats, compelling him to withdraw from North Korea. By April 1951, the military situation had stabilized, but MacArthur's public statements became increasingly irritating to Truman, and he relieved MacArthur of his commands. The Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a joint inquiry into the military situation and the circumstances surrounding MacArthur's relief, and concluded that "the removal of General MacArthur was within the constitutional powers of the President but the circumstances were a shock to national pride."[1]

An apolitical military was an American tradition, but one that was difficult to uphold in an era when American forces were employed overseas in large numbers. The principle of civilian control of the military was also ingrained, but the rising complexity of military technology led to the creation of a professional military. This made civilian control increasingly problematic when coupled with the constitutional division of powers between the President as commander-in-chief, and the Congress with its power to raise armies, maintain a navy, and wage wars. In relieving MacArthur for failing to "respect the authority of the President" by privately communicating with Congress, Truman upheld the President's role as pre-eminent.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following were true of the Emancipation Proclamation? A) It freed very few slaves immediately. It freed the slaves
mamaluj [8]

The answer is letter B. It freed the slaves in the Border States.

<span>The Emancipation Proclamation was the presidential proclamation that had lead to the freedom of many slaves in the borders of the United States. Because of this, the slave were legally freed from their owners after the Emancipation Proclamation.</span>

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE
    11·1 answer
  • Egyptian leader who laid the foundation for modern Egypt
    11·1 answer
  • What is the name of the frist pesadint
    9·2 answers
  • 3. What types of jobs did slaves do in each colonial region?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the first was that airplanes made a contribution?
    15·2 answers
  • explain why the greatest movement of African-Americans to northern cities occurred just before and surkng ww1?
    14·2 answers
  • How does the English bill of rights change the role of citizens in england?
    7·1 answer
  • Which describes a direct result of division of labor in early farming communities?
    10·2 answers
  • The Thirteenth Amendment put an end to what custom found in some parts of the United States?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes the Boston Massacre?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!